Sustainability, diversity and safety efforts not awarded with bonuses, UT study reveals

A study by an international team of researchers from the University of Tübingen and the HEC business school in Paris has shown that the payment of bonuses to executive board members in large European corporations is only minimally influenced by whether the top executives made decisions to reduce emissions, increase diversity in the company or improve product safety in the past financial year. According to the study, just 5% of executives’ performance-related remuneration is linked to binding criteria for measuring sustainable corporate behaviour.

The researchers evaluated a data set on the remuneration of 674 executives at 73 companies listed in the two major European stock market indices EUROSTOXX 50 and STOXX Europe 50. The data covers the period from 2013 to 2020.

However, the study also found that 60% of executives had integrated at least one of the ESG (environment, social, governance) criteria into their remuneration.

Companies, investors and regulators are increasingly promoting the potential of these metrics in executive remuneration to align the interests of executives with broader societal goals, such as environmental protection and diversity. To do this, they would also have to provide real financial incentives. But they don't, because ESG performance metrics are largely symbolic. So, for most companies, appearances are more important than real actions,” says Professor Patrick Kampkötter, co-author of the study and Head of the Managerial Accounting Department at the University of Tübingen.

The researchers distinguished between binding and discretionary ESG indicators, enabling them to analyse whether the incentives are effective or not.

Binding metrics are included in board members’ remuneration contracts at the beginning of the financial year, with a fixed weighting and providing clear and reliable targets. If executives meet or exceed these targets, they receive a payout based on the predetermined weighting of those metrics.
Discretionary ESG metrics, on the other hand, are more flexible. Supervisory boards or compensation committees can adjust the weight or importance of these metrics at the end of the fiscal year as they see fit, creating uncertainty about the extent to which an executive's ESG performance affects his or her compensation. As a result, executives may feel less pressured to prioritise these goals throughout the year.

Large companies, particularly in the financial sector, often have a variety of largely discretionary ESG metrics in their compensation plans but lack significant weightings, according to the study.

This combination suggests that for many companies, the inclusion of ESG metrics may be a form of greenwashing - signalling commitment to sustainability without actually promoting substantive improvements or sacrificing shareholder value. As in practice, non-ESG performance metrics such as financial results or share price development, continue to dominate the calculation of executive bonuses”, says Professor Matthias Efing of the HEC business school in Paris and co-author of the study.

Implications for policy and practice

Professor Patrick Kampkötter underlines that for ESG metrics to drive real business change, they need to stop being a side note in remuneration plans and become a central part of how executives are assessed and rewarded. Thus, investors and regulators could play a crucial role in pushing companies towards more robust ESG remuneration systems.

The researchers also stressed that greater transparency on the true weight of ESG metrics and clearer reporting standards would help ensure that companies are held accountable for their ESG commitments to both shareholders and the public.

Read more in the original story, in German.

Latest news:

Romanian researchers discover part of a “graveyard of mammoths” in the Buzău Valley

Tackling the health challenge through education & research - CIVIS special feature

Stockholm Prize in Criminology awarded to practitioners working to reduce cruel and unusual punishment

Master's Programme in Transdisciplinary Studies of Climate, Environment and Energy